• Terry Flaxton
    • Latest releases & exhibitions
    • Resurrection (for Jean Cocteau)
    • Flaxton Retrospective October 2023
    • RWA, FRPS, academic
  • The Present & The Past
    • The Present and The Past
    • Vida 1976 - 1981
    • Transition 1981 - 1982
    • Early Broadcast work: Triple Vision & Videomakers 1982 - 1985
    • Triple Vision & Channel 4 1985 - 1992
    • A Trip Sideways to the BBC
    • Cinematography and Scripting 1992 - 2006
    • Academia and a developing Artistic Practice 2007 - 2016
    • 2015 & 2016 Cinefest Bristol International Festival of Cinematography
    • Sedition 2015 - Present >
      • Sedition 2015 - Larger
    • Makersplace and NFT's 2020 - 2022
    • 2025 and beyond?
  • Artworks, Documentaries, Installations
    • Artworks, Documentaries, Installations
    • Longer Form Artworks
    • Installations 1992 - The Present >
      • Proposed Exhibition
    • Short works with a life of their own
    • Collaboration: Terry Flaxton Shawn Bell
    • Collaboration: Terry Flaxton Emily Burridge
    • Collaboration: Terry Flaxton Al Lethbridge
    • Documentaries 70s to 90s
    • Channel 4 - Moving Image Art Resources
    • Blink 2003 to 2012
    • Work on Racism 1976 - 2000
    • Short Dramas
    • Music Industry Work
    • Music and Sound 1969 - 1975
    • An Early History of Video Art in the UK
    • Theatre Work
    • The Cold War Game: The Soviet Union
  • Phd Home
    • Abstract >
      • Aims of the Critical Commentary
      • Introduction: practice as research as an investigative tool and methodology
      • Prologue: My Prior Development as an Industry Practitioner, Artist & Academic
    • Portfolio 1 Guide >
      • Critical Commentary on Portfolio 1
      • Portfolio 1 Complete list of outputs
    • Portfolio 2 Guide >
      • Critical Commentary on Portfolio 2
      • Portfolio 2 Complete list of outputs
    • Portfolio 3 Guide >
      • Critical Commentary on Portfolio 3
      • Portfolio 3 Complete list of outputs
    • Portfolio 4 Guide >
      • Critical Commentary on Portfolio 4
      • Portfolio 4 Complete list of outputs
    • Phd Conclusion >
      • Consolidated Bibliography of Works Referred to in the Critical Commentaries
      • Key Propositions from the Research Period
      • Complete List of Outputs
      • Extra Resources >
        • ​1. Context for Research from 1971 forwards
        • ​2. Emerging technologies in industry prior to the research period (2007)
        • ​3. High Resolution Research 2007 - 2010
        • 4. Higher Dynamic Range Research 2010 - 2016
        • 2016 Bristol International Festival of Cinematography Video Documentation >
          • Cinefest 2016 Trailer
        • 2015 Bristol International Festival of Cinematography Video Documentation
        • Research & Innovation >
          • Research Streams of CMIR 2013 - 2017
          • Higher Dynamic Range Laboratory
          • Higher Dynamic Range Research
          • Practice as Research >
            • Practice as Research
            • PhD Information
            • BLINK
            • UWE active in new feature film - DoP Geoff Boyle, Visiting Professor
            • AHRC Creative Research Fellowship >
              • Output One
              • Output Two
              • Output Three
              • Output Four
            • Short Works of Art >
              • Aperture
              • Zagorsk
              • One Second to Midnight
              • Autumn Dusk Cafe Scene
              • Les Petites Cartes Postales de Beijing
              • Water Table/The Power of the Sea
              • CMIR RWA KWMC Bursary winners
          • Artistic development and its relationship to the technologies of the Moving Image
          • Selling the Immaterial in a Material World >
            • Artists Marque
            • Harry Blain, Ex Haunch of Venison on s[edition]
            • How to Collect Immaterial and New Media Art
          • DataMontage
          • CML/CMIR Camera Tests
          • Moving Image Knowledge Exchange Network
          • Radical Film Network
          • Interactive Documentary, developing knowledge exchange forms & a reassessment of cultural value >
            • An experiment in online interactivity
          • DotMov Museum of Moving Image
          • Artists Moving Image Exchange Network - AMEN
          • The Future of Display Technology
          • The Photographic Image
          • CML UWE Camera and Lens Tests
          • Collected text resources
        • The Verbatim History of Digital Cinematography
        • Verbatim Interviews
        • The Verbatim History of the Aesthetics and Technologies of Analogue Video
        • A History of Video Art
        • Papers
        • Leonardo: New Utopias in Data Capitalism
        • The FIlms of Roberto Schaefer ASC, AIC at Encounters 2013
        • Professor Duncan Petrie on the structure of film training in the UK
        • An introduction to 'Resolution'
        • An Introduction to Motion Capture
        • Projection Mapping
        • Cinematographers Discuss Their Role
        • The Neurocinematics of FIlm: Hasson et al
        • RGB-Z Depth Capture in real time
        • News >
          • News
          • Past Events held by CMIR >
            • AMPS & CMIR Conference 2016
            • CMIR:ONE December 2015 CentreSpace Exhibition
            • John Hopkins, Father of British Independent Video
            • Bristol Festival of Cinematography September 2015
            • Bristol Radical Film Festival 2015: Commemorating the 1975 First Festival of Independent British Cinema
            • CMIR 'Lighting Faces' Masterclass with Geoff Boyle
            • Higher Dynamic Range Laboratory
            • Symposium at Encounters Short Film and Animation Festival, Aesthetics/Politics/Activism/Art: What is Radical Now?
            • 'VIENNA-BRISTOL-RIGA: A JOURNEY THROUGH RADICALISM' at Encounters Short Film and Animation Festival
            • Visual Activism(s): Tactics, Technologies and Styles
            • The Films of Ben Smithard BSC, Bargehouse June 2014
            • Bristol Radical Film Festival presents: Superlative TV and 'Equal Temperament' (2014)
            • One Artists Journey - 2014 May at the RWA
            • 2014 CML/CMIR Camera Tests
            • The Films of Roberto Schaefer at Encounters 2013
            • Professor Duncan Petrie on the structure of film training in the UK
            • The Stuart Hall Project 18th February
            • ISEA 2013
            • Community Filmmaking and Cultural Diversity
            • Bristol Radical Film Festival
            • Oxford Radical Forum
            • Bristol Radical Film Festival presents: Bristol Palestine Film Festival Warm-up
            • Bristol Radical Film Festival presents: Benefit Bonanza Solidarity Screening in association with Side by Side LGBT Festival in Russia
            • Past Events Further Back
        • The Future of Display Technology
        • CMIR ONE >
          • 18 Seconds
          • BOUNCE
          • 7 seconds
          • 4 seconds
        • BSC Expo Presentation: Terry Flaxton
        • Hotels and map CineFest
        • People & Affiliations >
          • People & Affiliations
          • Affiliate Academics from other Universities >
            • Professor Jane Arthurs, Middlesex University
            • Dr Sarah Atkinson, University of Brighton
            • Professor Amanda Beech, Dean, School of Critical Writing, CalArts
            • Dr Vince Briffa
            • Cathy Greenhalgh, Principle Lecturer, LCC
            • Professor Sean Cubitt, Goldsmiths
            • Professor Stefan Grandinetti, Stuttgart Media University
            • Dr Leon Gurevitch, Victoria University of Wellington
            • Andrew Demirjian, Specialist Professor, Monmouth University, New York
            • Roberta Friedman Associate Professor, Moving Image Montclair University
            • Professor Julia Knight, University of Sunderland
            • Dr, Lev Manovich Professor, The Graduate Center, City University New York
            • Dr Kayla Parker, Lecturer in Media Arts Plymouth University
            • Professor Stephen Partridge, University of Dundee
            • Professor Duncan Petrie, University of York
            • Dr Marc Price, University of Bristol
          • Affiliate Cinematographers & Filmmakers >
            • Renny Bartlett, Producer, Director, Screenwriter
            • Karel Bata
            • Geoff Boyle, FBKS, Visiting Professor
            • Sharon Calahan ASC
            • Catherine Goldschmidt
            • Jack Hayter
            • Dave Riddet
            • Roberto Schaefer ASC, AIC, Visiting Professor
            • Jonathan Smiles, Workflow Specialist
            • Ben Smithard BSC
            • David Stump ASC
          • Affiliate Academics from UWE >
            • Dr Judith Aston
            • Terryl Bacon
            • Liz Banks
            • Judith Bracegirdle
            • Professor John Cook
            • Dr Charlotte Crofts
            • Abigail Davies
            • Dr Josie Dolan
            • Professor Jon Dovey
            • Katrina Glitre
            • Dr John Hodgson
            • Dr James Jackman
            • Susan Mcmillan
            • Rachel Mills
            • Alistair Oldham
            • Dr Shawn Sobers
            • Dr Gillian Swanson, Associate Professor
            • Estella Tincknell, Associate Professor
            • Dr Sherryl Wilson
          • Affliate Research Groups >
            • Bristol Vision Institute, University of Bristol
            • Creative Media Research Group, ACE, UWE
            • Digital Cultures Research Centre
            • Film and Television Studies Research Group, UWE
          • Affiliate Cultural & Cinematic Organisations and Producers >
            • Aardman Animations
            • Afrika Eye/Zimmedia
            • Encounters Short Film & Animation Festival
            • IMAGO: European Federation of Cinematographers
            • Royal West of England Academy
            • Knowle West Media Centre
            • Watershed Media Centre, Bristol
          • Affiliate Independent Researchers & Artists >
            • Andrew Buchanan
            • Mark Cosgrove
            • Caroline Norbury, Visiting Professor, ACE, UWE
            • Peter Donebauer
            • Charlotte Humpston
            • Andrew Kelly, Visiting Professor, ACE, UWE
            • RIk Lander
            • Dr Ben Sherriff
            • Deborah Weinreb
            • Lucy Williams
        • Glow
        • United Digital Artists
  www.terryflaxton.com
Thanks to DP Review for this article.

Lytro poised to forever change filmmaking: debuts Cinema prototype and short film at NABPublished Apr 20, 2016 | Rishi Sanyal

Lytro debuted its Cinema prototype to an eager crowd at NAB 2016 in Las Vegas, NV. It sports the highest resolution video sensor ever made.Lytro greeted a packed showroom at NAB 2016 in Las Vegas, Nevada to demo its prototype Lytro Cinema camera and platform, as well as debut footage shot on the system. To say we're impressed from what we saw would be an understatement: Lytro may be poised to change the face of cinema forever.

Lytro Cinema from Lytro on Vimeo.

The short film 'Life', containing footage shot both on Lytro Cinema as well as an Arri Alexa, demonstrated some of the exciting applications of light field in video. Directed by Academy Award winner Robert Stromberg and shot by VRC Chief Imaging Scientist David Stump, 'Life' showcased the ability of light field to obviate green screens, allowing for extraction of backgrounds or other scene elements based off of depth information, and seamless integration of CGI elements into scenes. Lytro calls it 'depth screening', and the effect looked realistic to us.

'Life' showcased the ability of Lytro Cinema to essentially kill off the green screenJust as exciting was the demonstration of a movable virtual camera in post: since the light field contains multiple perspectives, a movie-maker can add in camera movement at the editing stage, despite using a static camera to shoot. And we're not talking about a simple pan left/right, up/down, or a simple Ken Burns effect... we're talking about actual perspective shifts. Up, down, left, right, back and forth, even short dolly movements - all simulated by moving a virtual camera in post, not by actually having to move the camera on set. To see the effect, have a look at our interview with Ariel Braunstein of Lytro, where he presents a camera fly-through from a single Lytro Illum shot (3:39 - 4:05):
​
The Lytro Cinema is capable of capturing these multiple perspectives because of 'sub-aperture imaging'. Head of Light Field Video Jon Karafin explains that in front of the sensor sits a microlens array consisting of millions of small lenses similar to what traditional cameras have. The difference, though, is that there is a 6x6 pixel array underneath each microlens, meaning that the image made up of only pixels on the sensor at any position (X,Y) underneath a microlens represents the scene as seen through one portion, or 'sub-aperture' of the lens. There will be 36 of these 'sub-aperture' images though, each providing one of 36 different perspectives, which then allows for computational reconstruction of the image with all the benefits of light field.

The 36 different perspectives affords you some freedom of movement in moving a virtual camera in post, but it is of course limited, affected by considerations like lens, focal length, and subject distance. It's not clear yet what that range of freedom is with the Cinema, but what we saw in the short film was impressive, something cinematographers will undoubtedly welcome in place of setting up motion rigs for small camera movements. Even from a consumer perspective, consider what auto-curation of user-generated content could do with tools like these. Think Animoto on steroids.

Front of the Lytro Cinema, on display at NAB 2016. There are two optical paths, one for the actual light field capture, and the other for previewing the live view and dialing in creative decisions like exposure, focus and depth-of-field at the time of capture. With light field, though, those decisions are reversible.We've focused on depth screening and perspective shift, but let's not forget all the other benefits light field brings. The multiple perspectives captured mean you can generate 3D images or video from every shot at any desired parallax disparity (3D filmmakers often have to choose their disparity on-set, only able to optimize for one set of viewing conditions). You can focus your image after the fact, which saves critical focus and focus approach (its cadence) for post.* Selective depth-of-field is also available in post: you can choose whether you want shallow, or extended, depth-of-field, or even transition from selective to extensive depth-of-field in your timeline. You can even isolate shallow or extended depth-of-field to different objects in the scene using focus spread: say F5.6 for a face to get it all in focus, but F0.3 for the rest of the scene.

Speaking of F0.3 (yes, you read that right), light field allows you to simulate faster (and smaller) apertures previous thought impossible in post, which in turn places fewer demands on lens design. That's what allowed the Illum camera to house a 30-250mm equiv. F2.0 constant aperture lens in relatively small and lightweight body. You could open that aperture up to F1.0 in post, and at the demo of Cinema at NAB, Lytro impressed its audience with - we kid you not - F0.3 depth-of-field footage. A Lytro representative claimed even faster apertures can be simulated.
​
The sensor housing appears to be over a foot wide. That huge light field sensor gets you unreal f-stops down to F0.3 or fasterBut all this doesn't come without a cost: the Lytro Cinema appears massive, and rightfully so. A 6x6 pixel array underneath each microlens means there are 36 pixels for every 1 pixel on a traditional camera; so to maintain spatial resolution, you need to grow your sensor, and your total number of pixels. Which is exactly what Lytro did - the sensor housing appeared to our eyes to be over a foot in width, sporting a whopping 755 million total pixels. That should mean that at worst, you'd get 755/36, or roughly 21MP final video output. Final output resolution was a concern with previous Lytro cameras: the Illum yielded roughly 5MP equivalent (sometimes worse) stills from a 40MP sensor. However, as we understand it, the theoretical lowest resolution of 21MP with the Cinema sensor means that output resolution shouldn't be a concern for 4K, or even higher-res, video.**

The Lytro Cinema is massive. The sensor is housed in the black box behind the orange strut, which appears to be at least a foot wide. It's thermally cooled, and comes with its own traveling server to deal with the 300GB/s data rates. Processing takes place in the cloud where Google spools up thousands of CPUs to compute each thing you do, while you work with real-time proxies.The optics appear as massive as the resolution, but that's partly because there are two optical paths: one for the 755MP light field capture, and the other to give the cinematographer a live preview for framing, focus, and exposure. The insane data rates for the light field capture, on the order of terabytes for every few seconds, means that Lytro Cinema comes with its own server on-set. The sensor is also actively cooled. The total unit lives on rails on wheels, so forget hand-held footage - for now. Bear in mind though, the original technicolor cinematic camera invented back in 1932 appearedsimilarly gargantuan, and Lytro specifically mentioned that different versions of Cinema are planned, some smaller in size.

Processing all that data isn't easy - in fact, no mortal laptop or desktop need apply. Lytro is partnering with Google to send footage to the cloud, where thousands of CPUs crunch the data and provide you real-time proxies for editing. Lytro stated the importance of integration with existing workflows, and to that end is building plug-ins to allow for light field video editing within existing editors - starting with Nuke. But Lytro is going a step further: they suggest the light field is the ultimate mastering format, and they're capable of converting all content - from footage to visual effects - into a 4D light field so you can, at any time, go back and re-render your film for any display device. This will be particularly important with the advent of holographic and other innovative light field displays. 

Thousands of CPUs on Google's servers crunch the data and provide you real-time proxies for editingThe 4K footage from the Lytro Cinema that was mixed with Arri Alexa footage to create the short 'Life', viewed from our seating position, appeared comparable to what one might expect from professional cinema capture. CEO Jason Rosenthal commented that the short film was shot on both cameras to speak to how interchangeable footage can be with other cameras. Importantly, the footage appeared virtually noise free - which one might expect of such a large sensor area. Furthermore, Jon Karafin pointed out there are 'hundreds of input samples for every one output sample', which means a significant amount of noise averaging occurs, yielding a clean image, and a claimed 16 stops of dynamic range. In fact, in 'Life', noise had to be added back in to get the Lytro footage to match the Alexa.

That's incredibly impressive, given all the advantages light field brings. This may be the start of something incredibly transformative for the industry. After all, who wouldn't want the option for F0.3 depth-of-field with perfect focus in post, adjustable shutter angle and frame rate, compellingly real 3D imagery when paired with a light field display, and more? With increased capabilities for handling large data bandwidths, larger sensors, and more pixels, we think some form of light field will exist perhaps in most cameras of the future. Particularly when it comes to virtual reality capture, which Lytro also intends to disrupt with Immerge.
​
It's admirable just how far Lytro has come in such a short while, and we can't wait to see what's next. For more information, visit Lytro Cinema.

* If it's anything like the Illum, though, some level of focusing will still be required on set, as there are optimal planes of refocus-ability.
** We're not certain of the actual trade-off for the current Lytro Cinema. It's correlated to the number of pixels underneath each microlens, and effective resolution can vary at different focal planes, or change based on where focus was placed. This may be one reason for the overkill resolution - to ensure that at worst, capture is high resolution enough to meet high demands.

Tags: video-news, cinema, light-field, lytro
Go here for info on Dave Stump ASC, CMIR affiliate
Picture
Picture
Picture
Magic Leap based on Lytro technology
Associated Technology - Holovizio